There's no point yelling at @@ozblue at this point in time.
The arguments he has raised are completely logical taken in isolation. That tailings dam looks very problematical from an mining feasibility perspective and from an environmental perspective.
I cannot believe SGQ and their expert advisors would be stupid enough to not be aware of this issue or worse, they were aware and ignored it.
And so the only way Ozblue's argument gets shot down is by SGQ coming out and expaining why it's not a problem.
If they can't this thing blows up.
SGQ Niobium Drill Result VS WA1, page-8
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 15 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add SGQ (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
2.5¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $24.71M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $0 | 0 |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | 770000 | 2.9¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 2.4¢ | 129999 | 3 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.27pm 09/08/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| SGQ (ASX) Chart |
Day chart unavailable