SGQ: TAKE OVER TARGET ?, page-41

@silverlake ...."Argonaut analysts"

LOL, that's your evidence, a couple of analysts speculated... Good grief, where is the bang head on wall emoji?

I'd bet those analysts know less about Mount Alexander than half the posters on here. Do you think they spent one or maybe 2 hours studying results before they came to their conclusions?

There is a good reason analysts are analysts and not traders/investment managers...

Have a good read of the middle section of the quote from JP ....
.."potential to develop a potential"..

...talk about covering your rear, this area could have "potential" for the next decade, but end up with nothing but potential.

I 'read' what directors really think of current "potential" by how much of their own cash they are putting into a company recently, especially when on high remuneration packages.

In the last 5 years I can't find a single 'Change of Director's interest', or 3y notice, where any of them have put in any extra cash. It tells me a lot about what directors really think of the "potential" here..