ok, is this over the top?
-----------------------------------------------------------
Before the election, he (Rudd) boasted he was an “economic conservative”?
Now he writes an 8000-word article claiming he is in fact a “social democrat” and foe of “neo-liberalism” who wants a “new contract for the future” that makes “the role of the state . . . fundamental in the economy”.
-----------------------------------------------------------
sounds to me like he's exposing the hypocrisy that is Rudd by stating facts.
- Forums
- Political Debate
- shaky rudd’s $42 billion gamble
shaky rudd’s $42 billion gamble, page-8
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 9 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)