rabbit i think we all know (haw and lcyers) that the mou is for 50% of lcy and not 50% of mt bevan. but if you take away mt bevan what really do haw and lcy have? a few small jorcd gold tenements. haw has a few other things that are doing nothing and so does lcy. sure lcy has rr and hamersley which are being touted as highly prospective (aren't they all) but how much would it cost and how long would it take to drill it to the same stage as mt bevan? then what is the risk it doesn't turn out anywhere near as quality an asset as mt bevan.
any s/t gain or pain will be shared by both imo.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- shame on you
rabbit i think we all know (haw and lcyers) that the mou is for...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 31 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add LCY (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
|
|||||
Last
1.3¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $100.2M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $0 | 0 |
Featured News
LCY (ASX) Chart |
Day chart unavailable