A true womens advocate that gets her husband to sit in on a rape trial of one of her employees then swears that she never discussed any of the details of the case with her hubby. Not a liar at all. And the reason she was ringing Whybrow during the trial . and asking for transcripts of the rape victims testimony was also because of her deep concern for the rape victim, obviously. And asking the defense team for private txt messages between Brittany and another staffer and telling the rapists legal team that they might find something interesting in those texts wasnt at all coaching the defence on how to discredit her employee, good golly gosh no. And then standing up in the same rape trial and lying through her teeth about when she found out about the sexual assault allegation, not a lie at all. She must have nightmares about writing the apology to Higgins for calling her a lying cow and signing a cheque for legal fees and compensation. Not a liar, not vindictive, just a big, warm hearted aussie sheila. Poor sod.
- Forums
- Political Debate
- Sharaz chucks in the towel?
Sharaz chucks in the towel?, page-101
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 33 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
RNU
Renascor wins a funding boost given it wants to produce a critical mineral – but $5M award pales in comparison to some
SKS
SKS Technologies wins US$90M award to supply power to international hyperscale data centre in Melbourne