Civil law is supposed to represent the expectations of the majority lay persons; in Oz that's coined "The man on the Bondi tram"; in Britain he's on the "Clapham omnibus".
Non withstanding Justice Lee's gut feel law of probabilities, I get the distinct feeling the majority of people on the Bondi tram don't share his opinion, many preferring the "it takes two to tango" conclusion.
This is the link to Sharaz's Twitter X post. It's interesting reading the general response from members:
Satement from David Sharaz.
- Forums
- Political Debate
- Sharaz chucks in the towel?
Sharaz chucks in the towel?, page-30
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 104 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)