Australia's largest stock trading and investment forum Australia's #1 stock forum

Sharaz chucks in the towel?, page-33

First 33 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
moondoong

47,270 Posts.

01/05/24

09:02

Post #: 73599144
Share

Originally posted by Reaper11 ↑

I suspect the key part is Sharaz's statement that Reynolds has rejected his attempts at mediation. By not contesting Sharaz is indicating it was his desire to settle, but Reynolds has chosen to proceed to court. Sharaz's aim is to accept a loss on the defamation which may not be a huge financial sum, but have costs awarded against Reynolds based on her refusal to settle before this reaches court, so that whatever she receives (if anything) by way of an award for defamation is dwarfed by the legal costs she incurs in doing so.

. Reaper

Expand

That doesn't make sense.
2 Upvote

Reply

Top Stories

I88

Infini soars 50% as company reveals it could’ve just made uranium history – redefining what it means to be “high grade”

Week 28 Wrap: ASX hits all time high; CBA shares' two realities; US inflation hits 3% ahead of China plenum

AS1

Asara Resources sells off Burkina Faso assets to pivot into Guinea – for US$13M less than last time it tried

Bitcoin investors need to know the risks

RCE

Recce scores US$2M deal from US Department of Defense for burn wound infections gel

There are more pages in this discussion • 101 more messages in this thread...

First 33 Last