Why? She was defamed and had to take health leave from work as a result of the abuse and vitriol she experienced based on the claims made by Higgins and Sharaz, which ultimately resulted in her resigning from parliament.
Your confusing your emotions with the case and what actually occurred. The incident between Higgins and Lehrmann's is separate to the blatant attempt to character assassinate Reynolds by Higgins and Sharaz, when as per Justice Lee's findings Reynolds at all times provided support and upheld her duties as an employer.
Just because someone is an alleged victim of a crime doesn't give them carte blanch to publicly defame and assassinate someone's character to the point of causing health isssues.
- Forums
- Political Debate
- Sharaz chucks in the towel?
Sharaz chucks in the towel?, page-75
-
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 59 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)