A $40m buy-back is better long-term than handing out $40m to shareholders as a dividend.
At least a $40m buy-back increases EPS (less shares on issue). What long-term benefit does a $40m dividend to shareholders have on the share price in 2 year's time?
If the share price is, say, $8 in 2 year's time, a $40m buy-back at $4.70 is in actual fact a $70m buy-back - 8.5 million shares taken off the register is worth $70m at $8.
A $40m buy-back is better long-term than handing out $40m to...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 7 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add A2M (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
$6.85 |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $4.952B | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| $6.86 | $6.87 | $6.83 | $316.1K | 46.10K |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | 5534 | $6.84 |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| $6.85 | 5147 | 8 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 10.09am 17/07/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| A2M (ASX) Chart |