I think that’s a good question and elsewhere there is evidence SQM powers that be are prepared to go their own sweet way with hob nailed boots on to get what they want. Two potentially valid counter arguments are that Kidman said things were progressing with SQM as planned in its last update and that Tianqi loves Australian lithium and has bought around 25% of SQM and just needs to have that purchase authorised by regulators before it has thecabikity to put atvkeastvTgree people in the Tianqi board https://www.reuters.com/article/us-...buy-stake-in-chiles-sqm-sources-idUSKCN1IG2TW
KDR Price at posting:
$1.14 Sentiment: None Disclosure: Held