Share Price Direction, page-78

Oh gee. Thanks. I really needed your personal attack. Lovely! Like many others you have just been incredibly rude but it's all AOK if enough of you are doing it.

Alternative views are not fully engaged with and there is a failure to engage on the detail. As you have just done.

It's NOT a weird thing to note that an auditor has left. They only hung on by what looked like a thread after the last AGM when the person they looked to have the most confidence in, Alan Studley was sacked by an angry mob. IMO.

It's completely reasonable to ask questions.

People speculate with a speculative stock.

But you refuse to do that on this issue. Why?

Yet all manner of bread crumbs and theories were engaged with for years about this company's outlook, with great enthusiasm.

Uncritically.

Could it be you won't allow yourself to think critically on this issue and others that I raise because you're hooked to a particular line of thinking?