I think that's a good statement - true they have always been trying for grounbreaking stuff thst would "change the world" but now the lead and founding scientists have left and it's really steered by one holder hoping to cash in ? But do the founding scientists really leave a job that has spanned most of their carreer when it is supposedly right on the edge of "changing the world" and delivering on what they had tried to make work for most of their carreer ?
Interesting times but i think it is very strange how it has played out.
A personalised tool to help users track selected stocks. Delivering real-time notifications on price updates, announcements, and performance stats on each to help make informed investment decisions.
(20min delay)