Why would credit dumbness refuse to prove with one simple word...

Why would credit dumbness refuse to prove with one simple word that it is not a generative AI designed to vilifiy and discredit positive sentiment.
Instead the administrators of credit dumbness report the bot as spam so it doest have to answer it.

And one of the administrators has been on this channel before to defend the entity Credit dumbness.

Despite the numerous vilification posters have received from credit dumbness he has only been moderated once from what i can see.

Stonehorse energy has suffered huge share prices plunges because of 18 month campaign by the agency credit dumbness to vilify the board of stonehorse energy with no substantive evidence as he has done on other channels,
And yet never moderated, instead posters leave ... ? why is that.

Hot copper ought to have a policy of excluding generative AI bots from posting or have captcha s to challenge them just like other websites do.

generative AI is not AGI or strong AI, it is designed to simulate and predict human text, and this can be trained with a certain focus such vilify positive sentiment.