Shareholder communication (rather lack thereof), page-27

Hi @m0ngy,

Just to clarify; unlike others here I have absolutely no issue with you or anyone else communicating with AP, certainly not in sharing your valuable insights and assessment of said conversations. Quite the opposite actually and I do wish that could continue however I have seen the flak you've been receiving for this and can understand if you cease sharing these.

My point is that ALL holders should receive a reply, it's simply unfathomable for a business to completely ignore customers - let alone shareholders! Some here are too short sighted, a professional co. that communicates inspires confidence in the company and that contributes to more money moving in hence a healthier SP. This is something we all want, any holder here who thinks it's ok to ignore SH is an idiot.... it's terrible for investor relations hence SP appreciation. Proof is in the pudding here.

Does anyone here truly believe that AP is running around like a mad chicken all day every day, unable to spend 10-30mins a day replying to SH? I bet my left nut he has plenty of time - though ofcourse now he's buried under a backlog of emails so he better get started.