If it is indirect it means they are owned by an entity he is associated with. If he is director of Aurora, he is associated with Aurora and has to disclose that association.
So no, he would not hold 22% in addition to Aurora's holding.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- Shareholder Injustice
If it is indirect it means they are owned by an entity he is...
- There are more pages in this discussion • 1 more message in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add CAN (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
|
|||||
Last
6.2¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $27.12M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $0 | 0 |
Featured News
CAN (ASX) Chart |
Day chart unavailable