I can personally understand why GSK only tested the manual toothbrush on human subjects using the brush for 30 seconds:
1. I have always been a shocker/lazy when it comes to brushing my teeth. For most of my life, 30 seconds with the toothbrush would be a long time. I suspect GSK knows that the average punter is just like me and have to adapt to the human psychology - 30 seconds is all we've got.
2. Recently my dentist implored me to get an electric toothbrush and that it will work wonders with my tragic dental situation. I did just that - bought an Oral-B pro-3000. I've had it for three months. Have kept to the instructions every day (30 seconds use in each quarter of mouth - 2 minutes in total). It's been amazing, but I suspect that I've formed the habit of using it for 2 minutes (and abandonned my old lazy ways) is because the electric toothbrush does a damned fine job compared to the antiquated manual thing.
3. In conclusion, I can see why OBJ is much more focused on the electric toothbrush idea - both for timing (the human psychology will be different - consumers will spend more time with it in the mouth) and also the more powerful effect that the oscillations will give to the Magnetic micro-array tech.
Just my thoughts.
J
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- WFL
- Shareholder update - goodbye GSK toothbrush?
Shareholder update - goodbye GSK toothbrush?, page-99
-
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 8 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add WFL (ASX) to my watchlist
|
|||||
Last
0.3¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $1.478M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $0 | 0 |
Featured News
WFL (ASX) Chart |
Day chart unavailable
The Watchlist
LU7
LITHIUM UNIVERSE LIMITED
Alex Hanly, CEO
Alex Hanly
CEO
SPONSORED BY The Market Online