If your correct about the 55%, and I think you might be, then it doesn't matter which way the group votes on any issue. However if they all vote as a block either in favor or against resolutions, it will give Nev's mob ammunition about them acting in concert and could end up back with the T/O panel. Their ruling actually mentioned voting as a block.
So the group should concentrate on other means of changing the board, like I mentioned about how re-nominating a person that has not attended any meetings really is against company policy, so they should bring it up as a point of order, prior to any voting.
On resolution 6 though, is giving shares to another shelf company at say 80c any worse than taking the current rights issue to the market? IMO no it isn't as I expect the issue to be a massive failure without an underwriter, yet if all those organizations you mentioned took up their full allotments then they will be 60-65%+ of total votes anyway.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- CDU
- Shareholders Move to Vote against Chinese Directors
Shareholders Move to Vote against Chinese Directors, page-38
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 9 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add CDU (ASX) to my watchlist
Currently unlisted public company.
The Watchlist
LPM
LITHIUM PLUS MINERALS LTD.
Simon Kidston, Non--Executive Director
Simon Kidston
Non--Executive Director
SPONSORED BY The Market Online