shareholders v community voices!, page-6

thanx for the explanation Neil,

and as a follow up,

1) do u think that the TWO samples where part of a batch or stand-alones.

in the event that they were part of a batch, might it not have been prudent for the powers that be, to have back-checked on the gross variations in results or even doing a comparative analysis against past results before grandstanding publicly with the false readings in order to suit their own agendas.

2) as shareholders of CXY, I believe that we are at least owed the results of an in-depth inquiry into the details of how THESE mistakes were made in the first place, in wot should be a 'fail-safe' procedure, considering that peoples lives are in jeopardy based on the results coming from these lab tests.

3) "chemically challenged" - we'll give that one a pass, eh/

LoL.