Hi Arms,
Yes, I did read the article through completely.
In the case of the article that you linked to . . . the brakes on the truck have not been maintained.
It was the truck company who was prosecuted and not the party loading the truck . . . even though the article says the loader should be responsible . . . which makes this article contradictary.
Obviously the content of the article you linked to, does not hold water in court. If a court where to have believed this piece of journalistic creative writing then it would have held the loader responsible.
Ship tracking thread - only. Reading is optional, page-625
Add MGX (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
44.5¢ |
Change
0.010(2.30%) |
Mkt cap ! $540.6M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 43.5¢ | 45.5¢ | 43.5¢ | $670.4K | 1.500M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | 79452 | 44.5¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 45.5¢ | 293614 | 10 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 17/05/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
|
|||||
|
Last
45.0¢ |
Change
0.010 ( 3.62 %) |
||||
| Open | High | Low | Volume | ||
| 43.5¢ | 45.3¢ | 43.5¢ | 200847 | ||
| Last updated 15.59pm 17/05/2024 ? | |||||
| MGX (ASX) Chart |