I don't see using a small caliber weapon in a port environment...

I don't see using a small caliber weapon in a port environment as being the best or even the safest option? surely a grenade launcher like the Firestorm would be a far better weapon seeing as how the kill radius of a grenade is much less than that of small caliber projectile firing weapons, especially when you consider things like ricochet? the grenades are also more effective at close range than projectiles, and they would have the added option of non lethal grenades also at their disposal if they so desired!


http://www.defense-aerospace.com/articles-view/release/3/108266/shipboard-protection-system-cleared-for-production.html
Shipboard Protection System Achieves Milestone Decision
(Source: US Navy; issued Sept. 18, 2009)


WASHINGTON --- Program Executive Officer, Littoral and Mine Warfare (PEO LMW) announced today that the Shipboard Protection System (SPS) was approved for production Aug. 26.

The SPS program is an Anti-Terrorism/Force Protection initiative to provide multiple classes of U.S. Navy ships with an enhanced ability to accomplish self-protection against asymmetric threats. SPS is a system of systems that coordinates command and control of sensors, ship's equipment, software, personnel and procedures.

"Achieving a favorable milestone C decision and attendant permission to enter low rate initial production (LRIP) are major accomplishments for SPS," said Capt. John Day, program manager for Anti-Terrorism Afloat Program Office. "What is especially notable is that system design and development was accomplished by Naval Surface Warfare Center (NSWC) Dahlgren, in a short, three-year span. Starting with guided missile destroyers, SPS will provide warfighters additional capability to help protect Sailors from attacks similar to the small-boat attack on the USS Cole (DDG 67)."

The Navy's Anti-Terrorism Afloat Program Office, a division of PEO LMW, is now authorized to enter into a LRIP for up to 12 SPS sets for DDG 51-class destroyers.

To benefit from various technology development programs such as the Navy's Fleet Force Protection Future Naval Capabilities initiatives, and to meet an aggressive schedule, SPS was fielded via installation of equipment and software sub-sets, or "block" upgrades. This approach facilitated the early delivery of useful technologies at an economical cost and addressed important capability gaps.

Future enhanced capabilities will continue to be incorporated as research and development efforts mature and available resources permit.

"Shipboard Protection System, low rate initial production, is a vital step toward protecting our Sailors, Marines, ships and systems," said Program Executive Officer, Littoral and Mine Warfare Ms. E. Anne Sandel. "SPS LRIP will enable the Navy to field systems, and gain valuable fleet feedback to evolve the technology further."

Following a series of developmental tests conducted at NSWC Dahlgren, SPS was successfully deployed on USS Benfold (DDG 65), USS Donald Cook (DDG 75), USS Laboon (DDG 58), and USS Oscar Austin (DDG 79). Installation and testing of SPS on aegis class cruisers, "L" class amphibious assault ships and aircraft carriers is anticipated in fiscal year 2012.

PEO LMW is an affiliated Program Executive Office of the Naval Sea Systems Command which designs, delivers and maintains the systems, equipment and weapons needed by the warfighter to dominate the littoral battle space and provide the warfighter assured access.

www.marinelink.com/.../Navy-Installs-First-Onboard-Ship-Protection-System-to-Thwart-Terrorist-Attacks-207314.html
Navy Installs First Onboard Ship Protection System to Thwart Terrorist Attacks
Tuesday, May 29, 2007

The Navy will field the first Shipboard Protection System (SPS) aboard a naval surface combatant this month. The SPS equips the ship’s commander with organic tools to rapidly assess asymmetric threats and defend against terrorist attacks like the one that severely damaged the USS Cole in 2000. Ultimately, most U.S. naval surface vessels will have an SPS onboard to provide integrated anti-terrorism/force protection capabilities while operating in littoral waters, such as foreign or domestic ports, restricted waterways, and coastal areas, where naval ships might be attacked by terrorist. To transition the technology as rapidly as possible to the fleet, the Navy is employing a Block development process in which SPS components are installed, tested, and enhanced through a preplanned series of engineering milestones. In the first quarter of fiscal year 2008, the first Block 1 version of the SPS will be installed on a Navy ship, with installation on three other vessels planned for later in the fiscal year. Block 1 will provide the warfighter with enhanced situational awareness while at pierside or anchorage and during restricted maneuvering.
Development and procurement of the SPS is being managed by the Anti-Terrorism/Force Protection (AT/FP) (PMS 480) office within the Program Executive Office for Littoral and Mine Warfare (PEO LMW).

With its layered AT capability, the SPS will allow the ship’s commander to conduct surveillance, track, and evaluate identified threats and respond appropriately beginning with a non-lethal response and progressing to lethal defensive actions as necessary. In the Cole incident, the ship was not equipped to identify and track small craft, ascertain intentions, warn or thwart the attack with a weapon system that was commensurate with the target. According to Rick Skillman, SPS integrated logistics support manager,

“SPS pulls together a number of COTS (commercial off-the-shelf technologies) into an integrated package of command and control software, sensors, tactical decision aids, warning devices, and weapons to provide a full-range defensive capability to naval surface combatants against asymmetric threats.” By utilizing COTS and common architecture for software and hardware, the Navy is shortening the timeline and reducing the costs associated with systems development and acquisition.

“Being able to focus on integration of existing technologies, as opposed to developing these technologies, provides obvious time and cost savings,” says Kelly Donegan, Assistant Program Manager for Shipboard AT Systems. “The challenge is in coordinating these technologies to provide a comprehensive capability to the warfighter to meet an urgent operational need.” The SPS is modular, expandable, and allows installation and operation on multiple ship classes and platforms with no increase in manning requirements. When SPS reaches low-rate initial production — or “milestone C” — in fiscal year 2009, it will consist of an integrated package of five major components.

• Two command and control consoles, one in the ship’s combat information center and another on the bridge, will display surveillance, environmental, and tactical information required by the commander, onboard watch officer, or other AT/FP decision-maker.

• Electro-optical/infrared (EO/IR) ball devices and other sensor systems will provide integrated surveillance, detection, and tracking capabilities against a full range of asymmetric threats.

• Non-lethal effectors consisting of acoustic hailing devices and search lights or dazzlers may deter a potential aggressor. Hailing devices emit high-decibel sound as a warning. Dazzlers or search lights project very bright, concentrated light to discourage the approach of a swimmer, small boat, vehicle or assailant.

• Lethal effectors will be available for quick deployment when the aggressor ignores the non-lethal effectors. The lethal effectors (small-caliber guns on stabilized gun mounts) will be scaled to an asymmetric threat environment to avoid unnecessary collateral damage from firing the ship’s big guns in a “close-in” or high-traffic area such as a port.

• On-board data processing and communication electronics will collect, integrate, and analyze environmental and tactical information and provide post-mission analysis. “Little R&D has been involved in developing SPS because the technologies, like the EO/IR systems, already existed in the civilian or military sectors,” says Skillman. “Most of our work now involves testing and integrating the components into a seamless package of electronics, sensors, devices, and weapons.”

For design and engineering support, PEO LMW is using the expertise of Navy’s warfare centers, adds Skillman. The Naval Surface Warfare Center (NSWC) Dahlgren Division serves as the technical design agent for SPS, and NSWC Crane Division is the in-service engineering agent.

By Program Executive Office Littoral and Mine Warfare