FB ,
I'm not sure how many times I have to explain this ?
The employment figures have been collated in the same way for many years so the basis for the ' true figures ' hasn't changed .
" What you're saying is that as each worker with a fulltime paycheck gets downsized to a 'part' time job he's still counted as employed in exactly the same way even if he goes from 60 hrs per week to 1 hr per month. "
Actually , I believe it's one hour per week , not month , to be considered ' employed '. Bit of a difference there , eh ?
Now FB , do you actually have any evidence of these people transiting from 60hrs per week to 1 hour per week recently to back up your statement ?
- Forums
- Property
- short, long, or neutral.
short, long, or neutral., page-71
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 1 more message in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)