FB ,
I'm not sure how many times I have to explain this ?
The employment figures have been collated in the same way for many years so the basis for the ' true figures ' hasn't changed .
" What you're saying is that as each worker with a fulltime paycheck gets downsized to a 'part' time job he's still counted as employed in exactly the same way even if he goes from 60 hrs per week to 1 hr per month. "
Actually , I believe it's one hour per week , not month , to be considered ' employed '. Bit of a difference there , eh ?
Now FB , do you actually have any evidence of these people transiting from 60hrs per week to 1 hour per week recently to back up your statement ?
- Forums
- Property
- short, long, or neutral.
FB ,I'm not sure how many times I have to explain this ?The...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 1 more message in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Featured News
The Watchlist
I88
INFINI RESOURCES LIMITED
Charles Armstrong, CEO
Charles Armstrong
CEO
SPONSORED BY The Market Online