how in 1 month can a comparison change so dramatically- might be a bit muffled in my post but go look at the original versions and comapre the 2 yourself.
Hrl has this below on their abid report – what gets me thinking is how on panax’s report on the 9th of July they can say panax has the lowest risk score of all the geothermals in australia, yet on the hot rock report panax has a higher risk score than HRL. It seems they change things around every report to favour whoever they are reporting on. Every company they cover has a valuation of 10 -100 times the current value. pffft
HRL Abid report
Peer Risk Profile Company Total Risk Score Project Stage Risk Financing Risk Geothermal Type Risk Resource Characteristics Risk HRL AU 1.8 2.3 1.3 1.3 1.5 RPG CN 1.4 1.5 1.3 1.0 1.5 GTH CN 1.2 1.3 1.0 1.0 1.3 NGP CN 1.6 2.2 1.2 1.0 1.0 PAX AU 1.9 2.0 2.0 1.0 1.5 EHR AU 1.8 2.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 GDY AU 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
Valuation vs. Risk Profile Company Total Risk Score Enterprise Value/ Resource (AU$/MW) Enterprise Value (AU$m) Market Cap/ Resource (AU$/MW) HRL AU 1.8 847 3 1,313 RPG CN 1.4 166,051 246 40,485 GTH CN 1.2 304,595 81 105,047 NGP CN 1.6 152,658 75 5,971 PAX AU 1.9 2,047 3 2,810 EHR AU 1.8 38,986 16 42,391 GDY AU 2.0 9,915 20 22,355
Panax has this below which differs greatly to the HRL one and is only 1 month between reports