None of the Top 4 emitters in the world are signed up to 2050, between them (US, China, India, Russia) they account for ~60% of total global emissions.
So the question therefor begs, should Australia abandon Net Zero 2050 for a more realistic and achievable target that isn't at the detriment of Australia's sovereignty, prosperity and productivity?
Context: According to Labor's own numbers we are well behind their emissions reduction targets and in the past 3 years have seen no meaningful reduction in emissions, despite a 50% increase in energy prices.
https://www.whitecase.com/insight-alert/us-withdrawal-paris-agreement-impact-and-next-steps
- Forums
- Political Debate
- Should Australia abandon Net Zero 2050
Should Australia abandon Net Zero 2050
-
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 13 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Featured News
The Watchlist
NUZ
NEURIZON THERAPEUTICS LIMITED
Dr Michael Thurn, CEO & MD
Dr Michael Thurn
CEO & MD
SPONSORED BY The Market Online