Dear Caz,
I was recently informed by a broker (who is also MD of a company (not VIL)) that when directors receive "free" options they have to pay tax on the value that the tax office attributes to those options. I am unaware of the amount of tax liability that would fall on the VIL directors should the resolutions pass.
The same broker, when I asked him his opinion on the proposed "free" options to VIL directors responded with "Why wouldn't you. The directors would only excercise those options if the SP was .03c or better.
SHs blame the directors for VIL SP being .013c. SHs, including me, find it very easy to criticize, especially when we have done a heap on our investment. Whether there is merit in blaming the directors or not, the fact remains our investment is only worth .013c on the market today.
If VIL SP goes back to .03c or better, and I think that is an absolute distinct possibility, I for one will not be unhappy with the Directors. The real free kick they are getting, is not "free" options, it is the fact that they only invest their money to convert when a profit is a sure thing. We punters do not enjoy that luxury.
I still think the resolutions are not that bad.
Just MHO.
Miki
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- VIL
- should have a tail
should have a tail, page-4
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 27 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add VIL (ASX) to my watchlist
Currently unlisted public company.
The Watchlist
CCO
THE CALMER CO INTERNATIONAL LIMITED
Anthony Noble, MD & CEO
Anthony Noble
MD & CEO
Previous Video
Next Video
SPONSORED BY The Market Online