You obviously, as usual, didn't search a bit more thoroughly.
The case can be refiled.
It would seem that lawyer incompetence is one of the last remaining bipartisan things in the USA.
Anyway, the Dominion suit marches on.
BTW, your lame attempted gotcha line "meticulously reviewed the claims, evidence, and procedural history" was the opinion of your unreferenced article author, not a quote from the judgement.
"Discipline case against Dallas 'Kraken' lawyer loses appeal
An appeals court has ruled that State Bar of Texas filing errors are enough to derail a discipline investigation of Sidney Powell.
An appeals court has dismissed a disciplinary case against Dallas attorney Sidney Powell in connection with her legal work for former President Donald Trump seeking to overturn the 2020 election.
The decision, issued Wednesday by a three-judge panel in Dallas, cites clerical errors in legal filings by lawyers for the State Bar of Texas Commission for Lawyer Discipline in its case against Powell, who has denied wrongdoing."
"In February 2023, Judge Andrea Bouressa, a Collin County judge appointed to hear the case which was filed in Dallas, also dismissed the State Bar’s case based on the same paperwork errors."
"The Fifth Court of Appeals this week agreed, and found that the State Bar had failed procedurally in its efforts to discipline Powell."
"“The Bar employed a ‘scattershot’ approach to the case, which left this court and the trial court ‘with the task of sorting through the argument to determine what issue ha[d] actually been raised,’” Justice Garcia wrote. “Therefore, under these circumstances and on this record, we conclude the trial court did not err in granting Powell’s no-evidence motion for summary judgment."
