i agree, but also am not too worried. This was expected. also in...

i agree, but also am not too worried. This was expected.

also in their past performances, lack of comms was common ground and investors weren’t happy then either.

but in the end, the result was what counted the most and the pay days the investors got, made them brand the leadership as heroes.

so whether it’s some kind of long term strategy, possibly keeping the value artificially lower than it should be for their overall end goal of being bought out, it makes sense if you look at it that way as from our perspectives as an investor - “what the hell is going on we are undervalued” VS a potential buyer looking at SE1 and saying “what the hell they are undervalued - let’s look at buying them out”

the lack of comms for the investors all of a sudden makes sense.

that’s the way I see this, while past performance isnt always an indicator of future performance, for me, it’s definitely a good enough indicator of why I wanted to invest and take a risk in the potential Gem.

nothing out of the ordinary here for me

Strategic long term holder, right here.

goodluck everyone