significant sulphides, page-23

re the Retesting Results announced right on close of trade Friday.
These announcements are nuts- first refer to % results, then ppm as a comparisom? Is this an intentional ploy to confuse average investors, or to comply with disclosure rules to favour industry experts and/or their 'insider' mates?
They should have explained the true change of results for all to determine if it was positive or negative.
Was this a positive or negative re-calculation of results?
Unfortunately this type of announcement must reflect badly on the company and management. The original announcement confused most people on this thread and another chat site, and they continue to confuse with this retested result?
PLUS, they announced on close of trade on Friday?
Bit of a worry! Can anyone throw some light on this? Not much point in contacting the co, and seems from previous attempts by investors they have not had replies anyway! Will copy this to another site for comments also.
I'm still positive on GBM, but getting very concerned, Look forward to some constructive comments, thanks.