Regarding whether or not a video on YouTube is using Linius technology, it is correct to say a video could have been generated using Linius tech then exported as an MPEG-4 and uploaded to YouTube.
But that means it's not using Linius tech for delivery. Given the business model is that Linius gets paid per stream... how would this be good for them in any way?
You might as well say that editing a movie together with iMovie and uploading it to YouTube is somehow helpful to Apple.
Said with all due respect, I just think it's important to be clear about this.
SIGNS OF LIFE, page-641
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 13 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add LNU (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
0.2¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $8.32M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 0.2¢ | 0.2¢ | 0.2¢ | $825 | 431.9K |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 67 | 138764024 | 0.1¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 0.2¢ | 20622708 | 19 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 15.31pm 21/06/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| LNU (ASX) Chart |