Signs, page-3

@rodb - this logic doest make sense - you're saying that an infrastructure asset is somehow dragging down the valuation of the whole company because of a dispute on a non-core area of exploration ground?1) The mill is an asset, sure there would be holding costs but they would be insignificant to the sunk value or strategic optionality of owning a mill..2) the companies main assets are two gold projects that host ~1mill oz.There aren't too many comparable companies out there that have a mill and a million ounces and $10m in cash but are trading basically like a shell.So I am still baffled at what is holding it back....