"
You have to agree that communications are abysmal compared to other ASX listed companies"
This was a rhetorical question!I don't think you or anyone else can justify that "
all is fine at GXY head quarters"!I didn't ask for a blow-by-blow description of what GXY is up to. If I did, show me!
My trust as an investor in GXY is built on the quality of the assets, the market it operates in and the team executing to the best of their abilities. So my opinion on the quality of the team is fundamentally dependent on the
quality and accuracy of their comms.
GXY says they are going to A, and I judge their competence if they did A or the explanation they provide why they didn't and now do plan B. Is this too much to ask for?
I don't think so.
Which brings me to below comment:
You said:
They believe they have commercially sensitive information they want to keep from their competitors and predators - which is prudent.@yanlin, I respect you and your contributions to the forum.
But this comment is total BS or give me an example!
Pond lining and shipping schedules are not commercially sensitive if previously announced by GXY. ID of offtakers are not sensitive when found in offtaker's company info. Why does GXY make sales price a sensitive piece of info if every other spodumene producer publishes sales prices? This only fuels speculation.
Who are the competitors and predators?
An unknown entity! A theory!
Well my hard earned $$$ in GXY are real, I am real.
I don't care who agrees or disagrees with me on a anonymous forum. But please don't twist my words.
