We can only really go off facts, not what you hope will be found. You seem to be the only one here who just doesn't get it. Does it not look very similar to Radio Hill as I pointed out to you at the very beginning of the Andover discovery but for some reason you choose to ignore? You think that suddenly the tenor of the mineralisation (something like ~3%Ni, <1% Cu in 100% sulphides) is going to dramatically change and the grades are going to sky-rocket? I just don't see how it is possible hence how that side of it can't be compared to Nova.
It's nice to have a discovery but some of us are being realistic on what has been found and the depth of it, which is the real kicker. There are still a handful of un-mined nickel deposits with similar resources in Western Australia and the common factors in all of them are the depth and the nickel grade of 1-2%. These are your "unknown" reasons.
Bas.
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?