I've read enough of your posts to start thinking of you as a climate denier rather than a sceptics. Sceptics work with the science and acknowledge when an issue has been clarified or refuted. You switched from CO2 to temperature without acknowledging I had clearly explained the flaw in your pretend conversation in the OP. Then you imply some reference to catastrophe in my post. Where is this catastrophe?
It this latest post of yours you drop the phrase "incorporating rare earths". What is this supposed to mean?
How about a few answers before the interrogation?
- Forums
- Science & Medicine
- Skeptic vs Warmist
I've read enough of your posts to start thinking of you as a...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 14 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)