I've read enough of your posts to start thinking of you as a climate denier rather than a sceptics. Sceptics work with the science and acknowledge when an issue has been clarified or refuted. You switched from CO2 to temperature without acknowledging I had clearly explained the flaw in your pretend conversation in the OP. Then you imply some reference to catastrophe in my post. Where is this catastrophe?
It this latest post of yours you drop the phrase "incorporating rare earths". What is this supposed to mean?
