Slater & Gordon looks to be winning over its bankers, page-97

There's no new balance. With respect, I try call it as I see it fairly and accurately. I posted yesterday a link to highly reputable legal industry newspaper that's now using my phrase in my OP thread @SGH "House of Cards" to describe SGH's situation. My essential error, as far as you're concerned, is that I'm not a one-eyed ramper of this stock. So I even when I post you called it right on E&Y on UK accounts, you attack me for not agreeing with you enough. Then when I later point out some subtleties about the audit, while still agreeing with you, you ignore the accurate points I've made that you've missed and attack me personally again. Then again. I do read your posts looking for the point somewhere, which sometimes a good point or two but essentially always is: blue skies ahead, regardless news flow. New to the forum, you accuse me of getting nothing right except the share price.

To re-phrase an old saying, "in the land of the one eyed, the two eyed man is King." Investing is for having two eyes.