No, that was based on pure behavioural analysis and the comment...

First 599 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
aniesbaswedan

6,681 Posts.

1545

14/01/22

20:01

Post #: 58878038
Share

Originally posted by StefanF: ↑

Its not though. Because you made assumptions that mike is being disingenuous based on your comment regarding "buying at peak". So its not like you used the wrong word, in that context you used a statement that you believe(d) in and it doesn't even make sense.

Either way, forget peak or not peak, its just unnecessary for you to make random assumptions about strangers on the internet. Thats what it really comes down to. You'll never know if Mike is being disingenuous so give him the benefit of the doubt.

Maybe I missed an earlier part of your conversation with mike but your comment felt super random and unnecessary. Add to that your comments about low IQ and I couldn't possibly be working in finance. Mate you don't know anything about me. You don't know anything about Mike. I don't know anything about you. The only thing I know about you is that you are very quick to jump to conclusions about people and act as if these conclusions are facts.

Expand

No, that was based on pure behavioural analysis and the comment clearly explains that. You need to purge that mistake out of your mind.

Strangers are humans, and humans tend to be very predictable. It wasn’t a random assumption.

We both know you don’t work in finance, at least not in the capacity that other people typically think when someone mention the word “finance”.

People’s motivation is highly predictable.

APT Price at posting: $69.03 Sentiment: None Disclosure: Held
Upvote

0 Great analysis

Reply