Not sure I understand the logic as to why they must be super confident re 105? To my way of thinking the 120 selection is just as likely to mean that they've seen enough of 105 and been underwhelmed by it - hence the safer choice in 120.If 105 was already known to be successful surely they'd be more likely to roll the dice on the riskier 120 selection.
I'm not suggesting that's the case - just challenging assumptions.
I'm overly anxious about this one at the moment. Unfortunately.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- smart risk/reward trade off
Not sure I understand the logic as to why they must be super...
-
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 17 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add NEN (ASX) to my watchlist
Currently unlisted public company.
The Watchlist
LU7
LITHIUM UNIVERSE LIMITED
Alex Hanly, CEO
Alex Hanly
CEO
SPONSORED BY The Market Online