Still ongoing as far as I know. Bennett and the Marshalls tried to have the defamation case thrown out, they were unsuccessful as per the decision handed down on 6/6/14:
http://decisions.justice.wa.gov.au/...AC54C9F0B48257CEF0026D02E&action=openDocument
And the judge awarded costs against the Marshalls, if I read it correctly he punished them somewhat by awarding a greater than normal amount, although not as much as Smith had been requesting.
http://decisions.justice.wa.gov.au/...20CBEE18348257D49002DB151&action=openDocument
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- EGO
- Smith V Marshall (Brooke and Kane
Smith V Marshall (Brooke and Kane, page-112
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 3 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
LGP
Record revenue of $10.2 million as European demand drives 40% quarterly growth, with $1 million in operating cash inflow and $0.5 million in cost savings forecast
BM8
Learn of the ASX-listed company that is well-placed to respond to the future global energy demand