smsl, page-46

Blackrivered,

If the AELB brought the subject then I would be concerned but the SMSL group can no longer have an effect as the election is over

I choose to listen to a more relevant group of people, the reason I posted my post quoting:-

"Patersons Securities analyst Andrew Harrington said in a note to clients today that the licence had a condition that required a permanent disposal facility to be agreed between Lynas and the government.
He said that facility was still being discussed but that Lynas had gone above any local or international requirement and offered to export waste that had been turned into aggregate for road base and construction.
“This is not an obligation but goodwill gesture from Lynas,'' he said.
Lynas said it was reviewing all press news to identify reports that deliberately portrayed Lynas as deceiving the public and the government of Malaysia, adding that it reserved its right to exercise all available options"

Was because what SMSL says is as relevant as Patersons Securities comments, yet some are choosing to listen to SMSL BS more than Patersons “This is not an obligation but goodwill gesture from Lynas"

And they only choose to go with SMSL because it suits their agenda on here