Hi Swandc I doubt it would make a lot of difference as a larger flow rate would come with efficiencies that would largely neutralise it IMO, quicker repayment of debt is one that Springs to mind...
IMO the most likely reason for the production rate they eventually come up with will pivot around whatever existing FPSO's are avaliable, if they go down that path.
If they convert a tanker or build new it's likely they would go for the maximum rate possible for efficiencies..of course the flow rate ,number of wells and time they expect the maximum production can last before decline rates set in come into the calculations also.
Be interesting to see if FAR stick to their 140,000 Bopd when they release their version of the future...
Cheers Whisky
SNE 2C-563 mmbbls, page-121
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 1 more message in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add FAR (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
51.0¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $47.12M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 51.0¢ | 51.0¢ | 50.5¢ | $22.26K | 44.08K |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | 148595 | 50.5¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 51.0¢ | 102895 | 3 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 15.42pm 03/09/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| FAR (ASX) Chart |