"So is it COP or WPL helping to nail down the schedule" Suggest...

"So is it COP or WPL helping to nail down the schedule"

Suggest it is COP Senegal as they are the owners of the 35% and by all accounts COP Senegal are now owned by WPL. IMO it's not advisable for FAR to accept this is just business as usual.

FAR should remind COP, CNE, Petrosen and indirectly WPL that the JOA was signed and agreed by all JV partners and that they now regretfully have to advise the following.

1. FAR believe the intent of the JOA with regard to the partners rights to consider PE, has been violated by one partner to suit the personal agenda of that JV partner and to the detriment of FAR.
2. FAR regretfully advise that the prolonged period of mediation regarding PE rights has failed to resolve the issue.
3. FAR are of the opinion that the JV it is now operating with the knowledge that complience with the JOA is in dispute. FAR regretfully advise they now have no alternative but to refer this matter to the court of arbitration in France for resolution.
4. FAR advise they consider they have been treated unfairly and financially disadvantaged as a result.
5. FAR now advise the Operator CNE that they will consider withholding future payments associated with the JV until this matter is resolved through the courts and complience with the JOA is reinstated.
6. FAR intend to pursue the right to claim damages as is the right of the injured party.

FAR advise they will at all times endeavour to reach an amicable resolution to these proceedings.

Let's stop pussyfooting around ! AIMO