Individual scientists are not the problem, the “committee” nature of the IPCC is the issue.
The potential for Favouring a particular consensus that supports a Committee’s preferred position is however an issue.
“Vested Interests” are the antithesis of proper/truthful science.
That’s why defaming and deriding any scientific research that doesn’t support the preferred narrative is a Res Flag to me.
True scientific endeavours should be open to all possibilities until it can be proven that any one particular idea is true and can be proven “repeatedly” by peers.
That’s why computer models that predict possibilities are flawed and are not reliable, they use guesstimates based on a lack of quantifiable information.
- Forums
- Political Debate
- Snowy 2.0 boss says NetZero is ‘bullsh*t’
Snowy 2.0 boss says NetZero is ‘bullsh*t’, page-114
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 54 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Featured News
The Watchlist
FHE
FRONTIER ENERGY LIMITED
Adam Kiley, CEO
Adam Kiley
CEO
SPONSORED BY The Market Online