I was hope that someone like you wouldn’t jump in so quick, GHeart.
I was hoping that bender may have done a bit of research and Picked me up in that Slight Furphy.
However, the example is relevant.
It was a perfect example of just how $$cience can corrupt and the consensus of opinion can be used as a Tool to drown out credible evidence, different points of view and arguments against a narrative.
We all want a cleaner world and a more environmentally friendly way to power our energy needs but is MMCo2 the beast that we need to tackle?
Is wind/solar a better option or just a quicker/more expensive way to suck the life out of our planet?
Do we really need a One World Order?
Is the IPCC a wholesome organisation with a desire to see everyone prosper or just a group of individuals who crave Power over the Plebs?
What about the major sponsors of the WHO do they also have conflicting interests in the pharmaceutical industry?
