It's simple logic. If you have 100% renewables they have to be backed up by massive storage and that alone will probably double the cost of the energy. Then after a period of no generation(wind & sun) the backup will need to be recharged. So you need enough wind and solar to provide for current needs plus that much again to recharge the storage, so at least 3 lots of duplication.
If you have 50% renewables they will need backup by gas or diesel, it costs to have these assets doing nothing.
Wind energy is a very diluted form of energy and hundreds of generators have to be spread over large areas to collect it meaning a huge web of transmission lines to collect it and if you build them on the cheap.........well we saw what happened in SA.
- Forums
- Science & Medicine
- So much for " Cheap Green " SA Power
So much for " Cheap Green " SA Power, page-24
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 548 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Featured News
The Watchlist
EQN
EQUINOX RESOURCES LIMITED.
Zac Komur, MD & CEO
Zac Komur
MD & CEO
SPONSORED BY The Market Online