Why would you need to replicate that wind capacity multiple times for a low wind period of a couple of weeks per year ?
Don't forget that you would also have large amounts of other generation i.e solar operating at the same time .
The pumped storage doesn't have to refilled everynight . It just needs to large enough to get through the low wind period . It might be only needed for a large backup role for a couple of weeks in a year . The rest of the time it might only be needed in small bursts ( peaker style ) so for the rest of the year it can be topping up thanks to surplus wind and solar energy .
Think of it this way . Australia has more fossil generation than it needs . That is because not all that generation can run all the time . Btw , downtime is closer to 20% and that's for a more modern station . The average age of Australia's power stations is over 30 years old . On top of that , because of increased load and the lack of any new builds in 30 years , we have had to build a significant network of peaker plants to make up the difference . More expense and more complication .
So the fossil fleet is made up of intermittent group of generators that combine to provide a 24/7 supply .
So , in a similar way , multiple renewable resources contribute to 100% power . Yes , there are non windy days just as there are periods of darkness where solar doesn't work . But all that is very predictible and therefore manageable . Much more so than the unreliability that is now creeping in to our fossil fleet . The recent media where the boss of Tomago has been complaining is an example of that .
You do realise that the existing pumped hydro on the Snowy is quite often paid to pump water ? Yes , paid to pump water . I would like to see the detail of that radio story you heard . Was it someone like Ray Hadlee by chance ?
Trouble with those shock jocks is that they are very selective with their information so I would treat their example with a grain of salt .
Comparing Snowy to a power station that has never been built in Australia is ridiculous . Further to that , the minerals council commissioned a study on that very subject and still couldn't come up with a convincing case .
http://www.minerals.org.au/news/independent_report_backs_modern_coal_generation_for_australia
http://www.climatecouncil.org.au/uploads/f9ba30356f697f238d0ae54e913b3faf.pdf
- Forums
- Science & Medicine
- So much for " Cheap Green " SA Power
So much for " Cheap Green " SA Power, page-55
- There are more pages in this discussion • 517 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Featured News
The Watchlist
ACW
ACTINOGEN MEDICAL LIMITED
Steven Gourlay, CEO
Steven Gourlay
CEO
Previous Video
Next Video
SPONSORED BY The Market Online