Australia's largest stock trading and investment forum Australia's #1 stock forum

So much for rising sea levels ???, page-57

First 57 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
moondoong

49,053 Posts.

1

21/08/24

14:01

Post #: 75305553
Share

Originally posted by greenhart ↑

The oil giant Exxon privately “predicted global warming correctly and skilfully” only to then spend decades publicly rubbishing such science in order to protect its core business, new research has found.
A trove of internal documents and research papers has previously established that Exxon knew of the dangers of global heating from at least the 1970s, with other oil industry bodies knowing of the risk even earlier, from around the 1950s. They forcefully and successfully mobilized against the science to stymie any action to reduce fossil fuel use.
A new study, however, has made clear that Exxon’s scientists were uncannily accurate in their projections from the 1970s onwards, predicting an upward curve of global temperatures and carbon dioxide emissions that is close to matching what actually occurred as the world heated up at a pace not seen in millions of years.
Exxon scientists predicted there would be global heating of about 0.2C a decade due to the emissions of planet-heating gases from the burning of oil, coal and other fossil fuels. The new analysis, published in Science, finds that Exxon’s science was highly adept and the “projections were also consistent with, and at least as skillful as, those of independent academic and government models”.

Expand

I'm a part skeptic but with all the previous predictions made over the decades someone was going to right in retrospect.
3 Upvote

Reply

Top Stories

RCE

Recce scores $6.75M R&D rebate

RSG

HotCopper reacts as Resolute Mining told to pay US$160M if it wants its CEO back

BIO

Biome reaches intellectual property milestone in strain development program

3DA

To make modern missiles, you need 3D Printing. And in that gold rush, Amaero is selling shovels

HAS

Yangibana 33% complete says Hastings, as it provides clarification on funding