So they spend almost a year getting sites back online?, page-5

A new trial with 6 mth end points but almost the same protocol other than having a totally minimally invasive surgical approach - how does this address the investigators Vincent about patient acceptance and this ability to enrol patients????
Patient acceptance seems to have been related to the driveline from my reading of John Erbs comments (nothing new about that). - so how does a new protocol address acceptance if we still have a driveline???
I don't see a match between the identified problem and the solution.
The solution seems as it always was ie to introduce CP2. - but even that now looks as though it needs even more time for development.