the way I read it is: Two previous holes in the same locations.... and that to me is not news as such. Don't get me wrong, it is a great result, but it is not from the recent holes as far as I can make out.
As for the other heading: Significant mineralisation identified... I like that a lot, but it is too vague.
the way I read it is: Two previous holes in the same...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 3 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)