I'm using the equation to extrapolate what the value of this...

I'm using the equation to extrapolate what the value of this engagement is had it been a 3yr engagement for comparison purposes.

The CAN group agreement is a signed variation agreement. My point is that for it to be a variation means that there already was an agreement in place which was met and then additional supply requirements came about which have now planned, agreed and signed.



I think describing the variation agreement as:

• "just a stated intention of discussing terms for a possible 6 more months" or
• "piddly 880 G for 6 months"

leaves a lot of info out of the discussion, which isn't very helpful. If you don't like the line of questioning - I don't really care.

$10M (over three years) sounds pretty good - it equates to nearly double the variation agreement with CAN. I've tried searching for the original Levins health agreement to gain more context but can't find it. It could have been a $15M - 2 year agreement, now a $15.88M agreement over 2.5yrs, to me the additional information is important to create an informed comparison. Hence why I asked the question.