Absolutely. Put out good, convincing data and the world becomes your oyster.
Vitamins are important, but they tend to keep us healthy, in general. They will only be helpful in fighting off disease if a person has inadequate intake of those nutrients (hence, the RDI information next to the chemicals in CGNC in the article) to begin with.
SLA may have a very strong future as a vitamin company if they are marketed the right way. No question about that, although it probably wouldn't justify their current share price.
No, I am not saying that all of those people are lying. What I am saying is that they (SLA or anybody else)have not clearly demonstrated any of the bioeffectives will be of therapeutic benefit to the market place in treating diseases.
Cheers,
Bill
SLA Price at posting:
0.0¢ Sentiment: None Disclosure: Not Held
